National EOSC Tripartite Event and Czech Open Science Day

Survey

Dear participants, we greatly value your opinion. We would appreciate a few minutes of your time to provide feedback on the National EOSC Tripartite Event and Czech Open Science Day you attended.

Name and Surname (optional)

Position

You are:*

Researcher/Academician

Representative of Funding Organisation/Institution

Policymaker

Project Management Support

Data Scientist/Analyst/Steward

IT Support/Technician

Librarian

Other

Please specify if you have selected “Other”:

Overall assessment

Please assess the overall benefit of the event for you [0 - 10]*

0 - waste of time ... 10 - full satisfaction

Content Assessment – Day 1

Please evaluate the quality of the sessions.

EOSC Tripartite Governance & Czech Strategy for EOSC, 1 June, 13:30 – 15:00

The content was aligned with the theme and objectives of the event and met my expectations. The speakers provided valuable insight into the topic and presented the topic clearly.*

0 - do not want to evaluate / I was not attending this session.

1 - fully agree

2 - agree partially

3 - no clear opinion

4 - disagree

Notes and comments on this session:

First Panel Discussion: Czech Contributions to Open Science – Open Science and EOSC Policy Priorities, 1 June, 15:30 – 16:30

The content was aligned with the theme and objectives of the event and met my expectations. The speakers provided valuable insight into the topic and presented the topic clearly.*

0 - do not want to evaluate / I was not attending this session.

1 - fully agree

2 - agree partially

3 - no clear opinion

4 - disagree

Notes and comments on this session:

Second Panel Discussion: Czech Contributions to Open Science – Funder Support for Open Science and EOSC, 1 June, 16:30 – 17:30

The content was aligned with the theme and objectives of the event and met my expectations. The speakers provided valuable insight into the topic and presented the topic clearly.*

0 - do not want to evaluate / I was not attending this session.

1 - fully agree

2 - agree partially

3 - no clear opinion

4 - disagree

Notes and comments on this session:

Content Assessment – Day 2

Please evaluate the quality of the sessions.

Open Science in Czechia, 2 June, 9:15 – 10:45

The content was aligned with the theme and objectives of the event and met my expectations. The speakers provided valuable insight into the topic and presented the topic clearly.*

0 - do not want to evaluate / I was not attending this session.

1 - fully agree

2 - agree partially

3 - no clear opinion

4 - disagree

Notes and comments on this session:

Good Open Science Practices in Czechia, 2 June, 11:15 – 12:45

The content was aligned with the theme and objectives of the event and met my expectations. The speakers provided valuable insight into the topic and presented the topic clearly.*

0 - do not want to evaluate / I was not attending this session.

1 - fully agree

2 - agree partially

3 - no clear opinion

4 - disagree

Notes and comments on this session:

Do you have anything else to add or comment on regarding the National EOSC Tripartite Event and Czech Open Science Day as a whole?

Thank you for the feedback.

Your answers will be submitted anonymously.